Fani-Kayode: All Great Journalists Are âRudeâ By Farooq Kperogi
I really didnât want to comment on Femi Fani-Kayodeâs viral communicative primitivism toward Daily Trustâs Calabar correspondent because of my knowledge of the state of Fani-Kayodeâs mental health, but Iâve read senior Nigerian journalists on social media rail against the Daily Trust reporter for asking a ârude question,” and feel an obligation to intervene.
Rude question? Well, thereâs no such thing as a ârude questionâ in journalism. A Chicago journalist and humorist by the name of Finley Peter Dunne once said, more than a century ago, that, âthe job of the newspaper is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.â In other words, journalists have no obligation to comfort the comfortable. Their duty is to afflict the comfortable or, if you like, to be ârudeâ to the comfortable.
Asking questions that get a politicianâs dander up, that inflame a politicianâs passions, is a prized skill in journalism. Here’s why: Politicians reveal the most headline-worthy information when reporters cause them to lose control of their emotions. Loss of emotional control forces them to depart from their scripted, predictable, choreographed, and often mendacious and boring performances.
Itâs precisely because the Daily Trust reporter asked a ârude questionâ (which is a charlatanâs term for a great question) that an otherwise unremarkable news conference is now grist for social media and editorial mills.
Journalists who think the Daily Trust reporterâs question to Fani-Kayode was ârudeâ and worthy of censure should go look for another job. Theyâd do well as publicists.
Malcolm Muggeridge once said, âNews is anything anybody wants to suppress; everything else is public relations.â Many Nigerian âjournalistsâ are actually public relations practitioners polluting a noble craft.
Thatâs why some of them apologized to an emotionally disturbed mental midget for asking him a legitimate, probing question. One of them even said to the Daily Trust reporter, âYou see your life?â
I, like every journalism teacher worth the name, teach my journalism students the skill to ask politicians trenchant questions that have the capacity to cause the politicians to throw tantrums because politicians, in a state of meltdown, such as we saw in Fani-Kayode’s news conference histrionics, let their guards down and involuntarily divulge the truth.
Smart politicians know this. Instead of allowing themselves to be immobilized by impotent anger, they respond to high-pressure, âembarrassingâ questions with poise, and disarm adversarial reporters with humility, grace, and gentleness.
Fani-Kayodeâs Vainglory and Ruling Class Tyranny |Oludayo Tade
“…Powerful people impress and intimidate by saying less. The more you say, the more likely you are to say something foolish”(Robert Green, The 48 Laws of Power)
The crass disregard for people in the lowest rung of the stratification system defines the character of the Nigerian society. It is a system of subordination where might makes right and the seeming âworthlessnessâ of the masses or common man is shamelessly uttered by those who have benefitted and extracted benefits from the system and are responsible for the state of quagmire which the society has been plunged into. Whether using âumbrellaâ in rainy or sunny times or busy âsweepingâ monies into their deep pockets, very few of the ruling class regard their people; majority are exploitative in their talks and domineering in their social relations. Their communications are laced with arrogance, threat and intimidation; all oriented towards silencing unfavourable tunes. Forgetful of the system of government in place, they silence through their anti-democratic laws and cramp active voices into detention. These parasitic elites whose milking of the common patrimony is the only credentials they can portray are sad to see anyone bring them to accountability. This is the sad tale in the viral video of a former Minister Femi Fani-Kayode (FFK) where he hurled insults on the Daily Trust Journalist, Eyo Charles for daring to give him an opportunity to clear the air on the motivation for his project inspection in certain part of the country and who âbankrolledâ the trip and in what capacity. He lost the opportunity given to him to state his own side of the story. He lost the moment to shine with egoistic vituperations, vainglory and unsound response.
Nigeriaâs ruling class have little or no regard for their people and are ready to unleash this reckless character anytime. The tool of intimidation deployed by FFK was that he was a former Minister with political history from 1990, former Senior Special Assistant and a lawyer. In and out of office, his trips show he still holds the levers of power and enjoy the ideological state security apparatus and are ready to intimidate anyone who dares to ask him to what honour do we owe his project evaluation trips. Someone who is happy to appear before the press for them to listen to him is unhappy to be answerable and turned it to what late Fela Anikulapo called roforofo fight with a harmless journalist. Robert Greenâs 48 laws of power counsels the powerful to âalways say less than necessaryâ because âthe more you say, the more likely you are to say something foolishâ. Unfortunately, FFK dared to speak live thinking everyone would be unreflective in their assessment of the ethical expectations of someone of his calibre. Apparently lacking meaningful response, he showed his helplessness by resorting to use his erstwhile political position (Do you know who you are talking to? Bankroll who? a former Minister; a lawyer?), his relationship with media owners (âI will report you to your publisherâ) and economic status (âI am not a poor man, I am not poor and I will never beâ) to intimidate everyone to silence. Unfortunately, he was not appreciative of the fact that a âsoft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up angerâ (Proverbs 15: 1) because whoever keeps his mouth and tongue keeps himself out of trouble (Proverbs 21:23). Indeed, only a man of little knowledge talks more than necessary because âwhoever restrains his words has knowledge, and he who has a cool spirit is a man of understandingâ (Proverbs 17:27). While no human being can tame the tongue because it is a restless evil that is full of poison (James 3:8), it is advised we are quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger (James 1:19).
FFKâs âdo you know who you are talking to?â dramaturgy reminds us of similar performance of a former labour leader turned politician, Adams Oshiomole who ought to appreciate peopleâs suffering but with power, he lost the empathy and asked a poor widow in the city of Edo to âgo and dieâ. He also described someone as âstupidâ. The âslapping Senatorâ, Elisha Abbo could not have a lowly placed store attendant talk to him anyhow and must humiliate her with âdirty slapsâ. He is also stated that the lady was âvery stupidâ. Notwithstanding the economic and social power Yinka Ayefele commands, a former Governor of Oyo State, Late Senator Abiola Ajimobi still dressed him down owing to disability after the demolition of his music house. To him, Ayefele ought not to get preferential treatment because he was an employer of labour because âthieves also employ peopleâ. Just like his forerunners were treated with public condemnation and associated backlashes, FFK was also not spared for directing a âvery stupidâ movie.
This âbigmanismâ is what poor people have reproduced in âI better pass my neighbourâ, a character of showing superiority over another person or making life difficult for them. This tyrannical conduct of disrespect is not only in the political realm but has strong presence in the family where might makes right culture is nurtured to produce disrespectful, uncouth characters and unsympathetic citizens who lord it over people whether in Church, Mosque, Media house, Educational institutions, organisations among others. What FFKâs low ethical public conduct unveils is how the fourth estate of the realm is being stifled to do the bidding of the ruling class â an industry largely controlled by the political class and their business friends. Good enough, Daily Trust management stood behind their man.
Unfortunately, it is not only FFKâs conduct that is condemnable but those of journalists present at the press briefing who saw no need to write a story on the assault on their profession and intimidation of one of them. Some of them were even blaming the man who asked the question. This is why it took more than 72hours for another media house to release the visual because the event was âbankrolledâ and they might have been begged to âkillâ that part while their colleagueâs esteem and journalism is assaulted. Those who fail to challenge their oppression will continue to be subordinated and intimidated. The powerful will continue to use the instruments of the state to perfect the intimidation of the masses unless they are challenged. Tyrannous characters are in every social institution but if we dread them, we become slaves for live. From the public condemnation and the battered ego which greeted the vainglorious Femi Fani-Kayode, we are all counselled to respect everyone no matter their social status and appreciate the wisdom in being quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger.
Dr Tade, a sociologist sent this piece via dotad2003@yahoo.com